<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It is or It is not (plagiarism)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netdiver.net/it-is-or-it-is-not-plagiarism/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netdiver.net/it-is-or-it-is-not-plagiarism</link>
	<description>Feed your eyes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:58:07 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil Brennan</title>
		<link>http://netdiver.net/it-is-or-it-is-not-plagiarism/comment-page-2#comment-13630</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Brennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netdiver.net/?p=1636#comment-13630</guid>
		<description>Put it this way, if anyone ever rips off photos of my dolls in this manner and makes loads of money out of them without my consent or any financial recompense for me, the original artist, I will take them to court and sue them until they are bankrupt. End of story.

Same goes for my poetry and other literary works. I WILL SUE.

Enough said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put it this way, if anyone ever rips off photos of my dolls in this manner and makes loads of money out of them without my consent or any financial recompense for me, the original artist, I will take them to court and sue them until they are bankrupt. End of story.</p>
<p>Same goes for my poetry and other literary works. I WILL SUE.</p>
<p>Enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jinnjinn</title>
		<link>http://netdiver.net/it-is-or-it-is-not-plagiarism/comment-page-2#comment-4645</link>
		<dc:creator>jinnjinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netdiver.net/?p=1636#comment-4645</guid>
		<description>This totally infuriated me! I say a good 5-10 years in jail will make her learn a lesson or two about stealing....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This totally infuriated me! I say a good 5-10 years in jail will make her learn a lesson or two about stealing&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anom</title>
		<link>http://netdiver.net/it-is-or-it-is-not-plagiarism/comment-page-2#comment-4401</link>
		<dc:creator>Anom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netdiver.net/?p=1636#comment-4401</guid>
		<description>This is blatant plagiarism and Mijn should be punished severely for her crimes. I hope the companies she stole the images from pursue legal action and she is shunned from the art community entirely. It&#039;s a shame actually, the people who purchased her &quot;art&quot; could have purchased the doll she copied it after for much less, and the actual dolls look a hell of a lot better too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is blatant plagiarism and Mijn should be punished severely for her crimes. I hope the companies she stole the images from pursue legal action and she is shunned from the art community entirely. It&#8217;s a shame actually, the people who purchased her &#8220;art&#8221; could have purchased the doll she copied it after for much less, and the actual dolls look a hell of a lot better too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Fatale</title>
		<link>http://netdiver.net/it-is-or-it-is-not-plagiarism/comment-page-2#comment-4264</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Fatale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netdiver.net/?p=1636#comment-4264</guid>
		<description>Reviving this thread, I just wanted to inform everyone that Juxtapoz Magazine has removed Mijn Schatje’s long article and her &quot;works&quot; from their site. When trying to open the link to her article (http://www.juxtapoz.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=6151&amp;Itemid=121), the page is already missing. 

Clearly, they are now well aware of the extent of her plagiarized works and have taken the necessary action. Good job, Juxtapoz Magazine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reviving this thread, I just wanted to inform everyone that Juxtapoz Magazine has removed Mijn Schatje’s long article and her &#8220;works&#8221; from their site. When trying to open the link to her article (<a href="http://www.juxtapoz.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=6151&amp;Itemid=121)" rel="nofollow">http://www.juxtapoz.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=6151&amp;Itemid=121)</a>, the page is already missing. </p>
<p>Clearly, they are now well aware of the extent of her plagiarized works and have taken the necessary action. Good job, Juxtapoz Magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB</title>
		<link>http://netdiver.net/it-is-or-it-is-not-plagiarism/comment-page-2#comment-4044</link>
		<dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netdiver.net/?p=1636#comment-4044</guid>
		<description>Derek:
The problem being that she hasn&#039;t removed the images of people that have not given permission for her to use their works. In fact some of her newest postings still show Kallisti&#039;s doll after Kallisti has repeatedly asked her to not use them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek:<br />
The problem being that she hasn&#8217;t removed the images of people that have not given permission for her to use their works. In fact some of her newest postings still show Kallisti&#8217;s doll after Kallisti has repeatedly asked her to not use them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophia Y.</title>
		<link>http://netdiver.net/it-is-or-it-is-not-plagiarism/comment-page-2#comment-2830</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophia Y.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netdiver.net/?p=1636#comment-2830</guid>
		<description>Response from LUTS, a Korean doll company involved, in a post on a doll forum regarding the issue:

Message from LUTS on this case ;) 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear BJD lovers all over the world

It is hard to mention our feeling. 
This case is shameful, sad and astonishing. 
Most of all, we are sorry for making a lot of people worried and appreciate your attention. 

We were reported by a customer about &#039;Mijn Schatje&#039; and her works (we are afraid of calling her works as &#039;art&#039; currently.. ) which seems to copy our and other company&#039;s BJD. We thought her works were obviously as similar as our photos of dolls too much. So, to deal with this case, we contacted a gallery to stop sale and exhibition of her works and we received answer they already received uncomfortable email from someone. (They asked some time to investigation by themselves)

We understand this case makes a lot of people embarrased and discouraged BJD companies and artists. It was really hard to deliver this case to our creators and designers - they were very disappointed and I did not know how I can comfort them. However, regardress of the fact, we also think the galleries, shops or companies which purchased or exhibited her product could be victims of her wrong behavior. 

While I look around this thread, I could feel many things... 
There are massive emotion and public opinion on this thread. As you know, it is easy to be amplified.

I know this thread and this community is rational, fair open space for all BJD lovers filled with passion and love. So we sincerely ask all BJD owners stop sending email to the artist and other galleries or shops if someone did. Instead, if you offer us any report of them or information, it will be very helpful. Now we have too little power to figure out how many photos were used and the copied illustrations were sold - and where - it will be so grateful if you offer help - then we can require the galleries and shops not to exhibit the works and stop the sale. We - LUTS, other BJD companies and BJD photo owners - should settle down this case with Mijn Schatje and galleries, shops directly with your huge attention and support. 

We all got hurt from this case - BJD owners&#039; and BJD companies&#039; pride about our ART works, our and other companies&#039; designers, creators and photographers ... galleries, companies which used, exhibited, sold Mijn Schatje&#039;s works , and even Mijn Schatje herself an her fans who loved her arts. 

(We can imagine easily how her fans feel when they recognize their favorite illustrations traced other photo. )
That&#039;s why we should step away a bit from the emotional point and figure out the best way to solve this case cleanly. 

It is the most precious thing we have learned from this case to find your enormous love for LUTS and other BJDs. It is so glad to convince your love, we all managers of LUTS - and I think all BJD companies would feel same - appreciate your concern from our heart. 

We will do our best to keep our and your right. 

Thank you and have a nice day! 

Best wishes, 


Dianne Song 
English website manager of LUTS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Screencaps can be provided if anyone wants to see them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Response from LUTS, a Korean doll company involved, in a post on a doll forum regarding the issue:</p>
<p>Message from LUTS on this case <img src='http://netdiver.net/images/overall/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Dear BJD lovers all over the world</p>
<p>It is hard to mention our feeling.<br />
This case is shameful, sad and astonishing.<br />
Most of all, we are sorry for making a lot of people worried and appreciate your attention. </p>
<p>We were reported by a customer about &#8216;Mijn Schatje&#8217; and her works (we are afraid of calling her works as &#8216;art&#8217; currently.. ) which seems to copy our and other company&#8217;s BJD. We thought her works were obviously as similar as our photos of dolls too much. So, to deal with this case, we contacted a gallery to stop sale and exhibition of her works and we received answer they already received uncomfortable email from someone. (They asked some time to investigation by themselves)</p>
<p>We understand this case makes a lot of people embarrased and discouraged BJD companies and artists. It was really hard to deliver this case to our creators and designers &#8211; they were very disappointed and I did not know how I can comfort them. However, regardress of the fact, we also think the galleries, shops or companies which purchased or exhibited her product could be victims of her wrong behavior. </p>
<p>While I look around this thread, I could feel many things&#8230;<br />
There are massive emotion and public opinion on this thread. As you know, it is easy to be amplified.</p>
<p>I know this thread and this community is rational, fair open space for all BJD lovers filled with passion and love. So we sincerely ask all BJD owners stop sending email to the artist and other galleries or shops if someone did. Instead, if you offer us any report of them or information, it will be very helpful. Now we have too little power to figure out how many photos were used and the copied illustrations were sold &#8211; and where &#8211; it will be so grateful if you offer help &#8211; then we can require the galleries and shops not to exhibit the works and stop the sale. We &#8211; LUTS, other BJD companies and BJD photo owners &#8211; should settle down this case with Mijn Schatje and galleries, shops directly with your huge attention and support. </p>
<p>We all got hurt from this case &#8211; BJD owners&#8217; and BJD companies&#8217; pride about our ART works, our and other companies&#8217; designers, creators and photographers &#8230; galleries, companies which used, exhibited, sold Mijn Schatje&#8217;s works , and even Mijn Schatje herself an her fans who loved her arts. </p>
<p>(We can imagine easily how her fans feel when they recognize their favorite illustrations traced other photo. )<br />
That&#8217;s why we should step away a bit from the emotional point and figure out the best way to solve this case cleanly. </p>
<p>It is the most precious thing we have learned from this case to find your enormous love for LUTS and other BJDs. It is so glad to convince your love, we all managers of LUTS &#8211; and I think all BJD companies would feel same &#8211; appreciate your concern from our heart. </p>
<p>We will do our best to keep our and your right. </p>
<p>Thank you and have a nice day! </p>
<p>Best wishes, </p>
<p>Dianne Song<br />
English website manager of LUTS</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Screencaps can be provided if anyone wants to see them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adriean Koleric</title>
		<link>http://netdiver.net/it-is-or-it-is-not-plagiarism/comment-page-2#comment-2829</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriean Koleric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netdiver.net/?p=1636#comment-2829</guid>
		<description>All I can say to her is if she loves using the dolls as a subject matter and want to use it in her work, take your own photos rather than using those from someone else. She obviously has a talent, but has made some poor choices along the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can say to her is if she loves using the dolls as a subject matter and want to use it in her work, take your own photos rather than using those from someone else. She obviously has a talent, but has made some poor choices along the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
